Fertile land along the Mississippi? Mineral deposits? Relative isolation via-a-vis competitors? Sucked the most able-bodied men and women, the most enterprising entrepreneurs, from around the world?
Or is Hell what made America great?
Is it not the fear of Hell that stoked American industrial might, ignited the ingots of Pittsburgh, built the bridges, and baked the bread? Is it not fear of Hell that marched our champions into the the sweaty south and freed the slaves?
The idle hands of St. Francis dropped a moisture into the blast furnace. It was a strange ointment with many odors. It was an odd perfume that all but extinguished the fires of hell. The Reformation Past was sacrificed on the altar of Tolerance.
Tiger Woods stands smoking before us telling us his crimes were private, no one else's business but he and Elin's. He evokes the spectre of Tolerance, a universalist balm that guarantees peace, and mutual understanding.
Michelle Obama appears on TV angry that her father had to work a "shift," at a "factory."
While I myself would prefer not to work a shift at a factory, I'd prefer that to a shiftless population obsessed with tossing down pastries. Michelle Obama is trying to get kids to get the lard off. I agree that we should do this, but how can we do it without reigniting the fires of hell, and walking on a treadmill, and invoking industry? Isn't it true that hard work burns calories, and that we've gone soft, reclining on recliners, declining on decliners, while we let the Chinese build our goods while plying us with sweet drinks, and getting us to lie down on cushions?
Love is not a bad thing, but it has to be very narrowly defined as that which we will crawl through Hell for, that for which we are willing to sacrifice, and never forget. It is not something easy or sybaritic. The fifties were already a lazy time. The Beats Pied Piper'd many of us seemingly out of the endless Egypt, moseying like Moses, meandering like Menanders, to the endless sybaritic false idol of the San Francisco Beatific vision at the end of the rainbow.
To reject that love and demand instead the Puritan view of love, with marriage as a divine institution, kids raking leaves for a dollar, everyone doing their homework, people willing to work in shifts, working at least as hard as the trees and plants, who around us strain for the skies, doing their best, putting out thorns, protecting their inner lives, protecting their roses for the one they love.
While we may never reignite the fires of hell to the extent that our ancestors knew them, dowsed as they may be now with the unguent perfume of Tolerance, smoke billowing up in the names of Amy Bishop, Tiger Woods, and Saint Francis, and as immigrants pour in that have never read the Ten Commandments, and if the volcano of Puritanical Industry has been exchanged for the moonwalk, and hip hop, and sitting idle on a cushion and saying, um, um, we do look back on the greatness of American life as a time in which America's butt was scorched, long before the universalist message became a soothing balm, and we became marshmallows looking to the government for a bailout, an easier grade, a softer pillow.
Tolerance is what America must fear. And the answer? A narrower conception of love, an aperture, surrounded by the fiery foe & the furnace.
16 comments:
Love is patient,
love is kind.
It does not envy,
it does not boast,
it is not proud.
It is not rude,
it is not self-seeking,
it is not easily angered,
it keeps no record of wrongs.
Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.
It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.
Love never fails.
It is clear what the Beats bandied as love was something far inferior.
Fear of Hell (Law) can accomplish many things. But reclaiming love is not one of them.
But what might real love call us to do? Might it call for fewer easy solutions and more painful sacrifice? I suppose that evokes the crawling through hell for love that you mention.
Would it be right to say that a defining characteristic of our society is "easy?" Convenience in all things?
But the thought of using hell as a means to better our society does not please me. It is utilitarian. How about using shame instead? Shame is thoroughly out of style and the consequences have not been pretty. We should feel shame for some of the garbage we inflict on other people. Casual sex? Selfish bastard; think of something other than your own pants. Noisy kids in the supermarket? Stop being a wuss and discipline your kids so that they don't become a rash on society and a detriment to themselves.
Ah yes, shame.
It's traditional in professional golf for the wife and kids to fly halfway across the country to make an appearance on the course at the eighteenth green to console or congratulate their partner in life when it's apparent that the golfer in question has a reasonable chance of winning. This is something that happens only three or four times in the entire career of ninety-five percent of professional golfers on the tour. A victory is a million dollar payday that will alter their lives from that point onward. A loss can be emotionally devastating as the player may never again get that close to winning. But third or fourth place money is good enough so that a player's spouse knows she doesn't want him considering new management that promises to push him to that next level.
Over the course of his career Tiger Woods has won fully a third of the tour events he's entered. He's had seasons when he's won half of the events he's played and has never failed to finish in the top ten, usually the top five. That means he's in contention to win nearly every time he tees it up. His wife shows up for the majors.
Woods hasn't needed the money that goes with a win since long before he met his wife. His wife's efforts played no part in bringing about his life changing first win. His wife's mother is a professional politician and her father is a radio talk show host. They divorced when she was a child. She understood broken vows and broken marriages before she was ten years old. The miracle is that their union has endured long enough for them to reproduce.
Tiger only plays half a season as it is. So he spends half the year at home in Orlando with his wife and children. The other half is devoted to his quest. He needs four more majors to eclipse Jack Nicklaus. When he breaks the record are we going to demean it with a monogamy asterisk?
Twenty years ago Fred Couples and Davis Love had the game to be the dominant players of their era. They each won only one major and their victory totals were quite low considering the number of times they were in contention to win. A top five finish was good money even then and generally they were quite content to walk away from each event with a big check while letting someone else hoist the trophy, shake the sponsors hand and make a speech on national television. When Couples finally won the Masters his marriage fell apart and he was a mess for three years. Love spent the next five years as the greatest player to never win a major until he finally consented to go home with a trophy for the PGA.
Winning majors is a messy job. Let's get a black guy to do it.
Golf backwards is flog.
Very peculiar sermon today, Padre.
I'm not sure I could put all those misshapen pieces into any kind of order.
Poor Tiger. He built a career out of politically correct inter-racial ambition, honing his image, constructing his myth--only to be overturned by his own sexual over-weenie.
Which part of his genes did him in?
From Wiki:
"Woods was born in Cypress, California, to Earl (1932–2006) and Kultida (Tida) Woods (born 1944). He is the only child of their marriage but has two half-brothers, Earl Jr. (born 1955) and Kevin (born 1957), and one half-sister, Royce (born 1958) from the 18-year marriage of Earl Woods and his first wife, Barbara Woods Gray. Earl, a retired United States Army lieutenant colonel and Vietnam War veteran, was of mixed African American, Chinese and Native American ancestry. Kultida (née Punsawad), originally from Thailand, is of mixed Thai, Chinese, and Dutch ancestry. This makes Woods himself half Asian (one-quarter Chinese and one-quarter Thai), one-quarter African American, one-eighth Native American, and one-eighth Dutch.[10] He refers to his ethnic make-up as “Cablinasian” (a syllabic abbreviation he coined from Caucasian, Black, (American) Indian, and Asian)."
He's a virtual salad of ethnic seasonings. But I see his philandering as an expression of his life force. Tiger must pass his multi-cultural seed on. His vanity demands it.
Curtis, do you think his main idea is to have children with all these bar waitresses and half-actresses, and other fly-by-nights?
I didn't get that impression, but I could be wrong.
I think his nature is to propagate. His copulations are symbolic. He thinks of himself as the top baboon on the hierarchy, hence he gets to bang every female in the troop.
The quintessential uncivilized man. A true primitive. Living by the law of the jungle, the way of the tribe. Each male he meets must genuflect before him, and he gets to pee on them.
Did I say primitive? Each conquest on the green rates a night at the hotel. We have to give our heroes some room. They're not like us. They live by a different code.
Infidelity and pro sports go hand in hand...
Jordan, Bird, Magic, were all famously unfaithful. Kobe too, of course.
I'm sure football players are out there humpin' around like nobody's business...but I don't follow football as closely...
Kobe got in trouble for it because a girl claimed rape...true or no, nobody seems to know.
Magic got in trouble for it because it gave him AIDS...Although people gave him more sympathy than any sort of reprimand for his behavior, really.
Tiger Woods is an interesting case. Why the uproar over Him vs. most other pro athletes? I think it's because it started with quasi-domestic-violence-possibly...which is a no-no, or an interesting read, or plays into 'golfers are weak, teehee he got beat up by his wife'...and because he plays Golf, which is a game old men like, and because he kinda Did get sold as squeaky-clean, unlike B-ballers who are generally sold as virile manmachines of manliness.
Charles Barkley gets pulled over for drunk driving, saying he needs to get let off to go get the best BJ of his life...and the only thing that people really cared about was the drunk driving part.
It's interesting.
Maybe this is the opening of the floodgates - politicians' personal behavior was a private matter until relatively recently (thus the media not reporting on the indiscretions of Mr. Kennedy). Sports stars have had a longer pass from journalists wrt their personal lives...
It's more of an old-school reporting world in that sense...
Maybe Woods will change this, and all of our sports heroes will come crashing down under the weight of their humanness and unfaithful horniness.
There's that balance reporters have to strike: "If we report on adulterers, we'll get attention for the articles...but then the athletes will suffer, and not like us, and so we might lose that side of the business..."
It's true that David Robinson and A.C. Green should be models for the rest of the professional athletes, but I'm afraid they were the exceptions that proved the rules...
It's probably true that when you enter the limelight, you sacrifice a part of your privacy. Whether this is a good thing or not hardly matters. Paparazzi shoot first and don't worry about ethics.
There's always a hunger for dirt on celebrities.
Once upon a time, the media left statesmen and upper crusters alone. No longer. Everyone's game now. Point and shoot.
The cleaner your image, the harder you fall.
The fun and funny part is Tiger's wife chasing him with a driver, and plunking out the window on the SUV. "You philandering SOB! Take that!"
Tiger's image was so squeaky he could wade into a swamp and stay thoroughly dry. Or so we all thought. But the emperor's clothes were just as porous as ours, it turns out. He's all wet!!
Hey Brett--do you like A.C. Green? I have a signed & framed picture of him for some reason.
I think I like A.C. Green - to be honest, I was pretty young when he was actually playing at his peak...but the idea that somebody could be in that environment and stay away from the lascivious fracas shows a great deal of character - especially because I don't remember him being a loud over-evangelizing self-righteous douche either. Just a guy with principles who stuck to them... It's a heartening and encouraging example for this good-lookin', virile 28-year-old who's oft surrounded by cute & adoring 20-somethin' chicas with loose-ish morals.
I recently read that males seeking exclusivity in relationships is a 'novel' trait that is directly linked with intelligence. This is also heartening:-)
A.C. was also the Cal Ripken of basketball...most consecutive games played and all that, missed just three games in a very long career. I'm pretty sure there's a direct link between that stat and his personal discipline.
Curtis, I think when someone is flagrantly unlike the image they present we smell hypocrisy.
Tiger presented himself as a clean-cut All-American Guy.
He turned out to be one of the biggest bounders of all time. He's lying in at least a dozen women's faces concurrently, including into the face of his own wife.
I think most of us would forgiven one transgression, but this is such a massive fraud -- telling multiple women he cares only for them and carrying on with them for years and years.
It's outrageous, but again, I don't think we would care if it was Dennis Rodman doing this, or if it was Snoooop Dooggggg. That would be par for the course.
But golf at Tiger's level is supposed to be a gentleman's game, and to have a sense of decency about it.
I think it's also that the game he plays is not boxing, or one of the more lower-class sports.
Tiger is supposedly a gentleman's gentleman.
I realize such things are fictions, or myths, to a certain extent, but nevertheless, this was so out of keeping with the character he's presented that it's weird.
It's notable that, as far as I could tell, the only PGA tour player in attendance at Tiger's press conference was Notah Begay, Tiger's Stanford teammate and the only full-blooded Native American on the tour. He sat in the front row and was the first to give Tiger a hug after he made his statement.
Begay was an All-American at Stanford, earned his tour card a few years after turning pro and won twice in each of his first two seasons on tour. He was set for life it seemed, but then he bumped his car into a parked car while departing from a hometown watering hole in Albuquerque. He was arrested for a DUI and sentenced to a year in jail with all but one week of his sentence suspended. He did his week in jail and has spent the last ten years working very hard to rehabilitate his image.
Tiger has been a mainstay of support for him in that effort. I can't imagine Tiger wasn't advised to drop his former college roommate like a hot potato.
Last year Begay finally regained his tour card at Q-school. After ten years of struggle on and off of the Nationwide and European tours with a nagging back injury he is again fully eligible this year to enter tour events without soliciting sponsor's exemptions based upon his performance prior to his DUI.
Begay can play. He and David Duvall are the only active players I know of who have ever shot 59 in a tour event. Tiger's never done it.
Notah's older brother was his caddy on tour. When Notah hit the skids his brother took a job caddying for Dorothy Delasin on the LPGA. She became the first Filipina to ever win a tour event with him on the bag.
Golf at any level is a gentleman's game. It's based on honesty. Tiger's blown a bit of that, no?
Tiger, it turns out, is a sex junkie.
Maybe, as a teenager, he was kept on a strict regimen, forbidden to play or interact with other kids in unsupervised venues.
That would in part explain his shadow identity, and the concentration on a vicarious, private world of multiple sexual partners.
He definitely has psychological problems. The public versus private identities.
Great player, though.
Post a Comment